10 Pack 8GB USB 2.0 Flash Drive Memory Stick, Vuefamy Swivel Thumb Drives Bulk for Data Storage with Lanyards and Removable Labels (8GB 10 Pack, Black)

At 32gb you can move or store a lot of information easily with these USD Flash Drives. We are using them to store different clients info separately, and it also allows us to lock them away so only authorized people can access the info. They copy & read quickly especially if you plug them into a USB 3.2 2x2 socket. An inexpensive way to store or move your vital information to where it is needed.

These thumb drives are as expected and will make great stocking stuffers. They tested well and indicated no errors. I am happy with my acquistion.

For a cheap multipack of USB drives they seem to be decent. Comes with lanyards for each of the drives and some label stickers. Surprisingly the drives that worked, worked better than advertised. In crystaldiskmark I was seeing sequential reads up to 150MB/s and writs up to 60MB/s. So as a whole getting more than payed for. As for the downsides, there are a couple in my opinion. First thing is that one of the drives just straight didnt work. Disk management would see it, but couldnt recognize it as having any storage. Second there is no labeling on them at all, no size indicator or anything. Lastly, they all showed up in a larger bag and individually packaged as well, which is just wasteful packaging. As a whole seems like a decent product, and 1 out of 5 not working for the price doesnt seem to bad to me.

I love USBs that have attached covers. I am really good at losing the caps to ones that have separate pieces. The fact that this is a set of five and comes with straps is just a bonus. Blue is also my favorite color but that’s just a coincidence. I got these to back up some files at work externally and they worked perfectly. Glad to have extras.

Its convenient to have little spare flash drives to share with others when you have computer files to give them. They get the files and a little flash drive to do the same for someone else. Each flash drive 4gb includes a capacity indicator that sticks on the unique sealing wrap and does not obstruct after your logo printing. Swivel design; 360 degree rotation design with rope-hole; simply attachable to keychain or lanyard. Simple to transport and prevent losing. While connected, the led indicator is red; when operating, it blinks. Cool gadgets to have around.

Kudos to Amazon for establishing Amazon Vine, their unbiased review program, and to the vendors and manufacturers who are willing to put their products up for real world testing and review! This review is for: “32GB Flash Drive USB 3.0 Thumb Drive 5 Pack High Speed Swivel Memory Stick...” Five drives in the package with lanyards and labels. The drives appear to be very well-made and feel substantial when you hold them. I have not used them extensively, but based on my limited use thus far, I rate them a EXCELLENT! I will update this review if needed based on positive or negative experience after further use.

This 10 pack of thumb drives is a great value for backing up discrete data chunks for portability and archive purposes. I use them to back up completed-job folders with large graphics files that I may have to access in the future but don’t want left cluttering up my system or the cloud. The included labels help me keep them organized.

For the money, these are actually pretty nice little flash drives. They arent going to win any awards, but they seem to work and work well. The actual capacity in hard drive math is 62.9Gb (58.5Gb in regular math), which is slightly lower than 64Gb, but as they admit this up front and explicitly list it in the item description, I have no issue with it. Honesty is a good thing! The drives come formatted using the exFAT file system, which does typically offer the best cross platform compatibility, but has never been known for performance. So, for most of my performance testing I reformatted the drives using NTFS and those are the results I show. I also did a bit of testing with the drive formatted in exFAT and the results were about what I would expect, although the benchmark results were.... interesting. First off, I was able to copy a full 60Gb file to the drive and back successfully, which is always a good thing to check on off brand flash drives, as in years past they sometimes were smaller drives in disguise. I saw no such issues here and the full capacity of the drive worked properly. Under Windows on a USB 3 port the transfer speed would bounce from 60MB/s down to almost zero about once per minute, with the average speed of the transfer working out to around 38MB/s. It took around 26 minutes to copy the entire file to the drive. Honestly, for this class drive, this is not bad at all and, as they only advertise write speeds of above 15MB/s, way better than expected. Once again, here is a cheer for honesty in advertising! The bounciness in the transfer speed is very typical as the buffers on the drive fill up and the data then has to be written to the actual flash module and tends to average out to what the underlying write speed of the flash actually is. When I read the file back off the drive, I actually was getting sustained read speeds of around 122MB/s, so no complaints at all there as that is also roughly 2x what they advertise. Be aware however that these were large sequential read/write operations on a single file. Small block I/O on lots of smaller files is likely to be much, much worse, as while the underlying flash is pretty decent, the actual number of IOPS for this type drive is usually not fantastic. While I didnt benchmark small block I/O by hand, you can get an idea of the rough performance delta by looking at the CrystalDiskMark results. Just for completeness, I did do a bit of testing using exFAT and while the read results were essentially identical, the average write speed copying the file to the disk was around 29MB/s and it took almost 35 minutes to complete. What is interesting is that the CrystalDiskMark results for exFAT showed write speeds of 95-102 MB/s, which is well above the drives actual performance. I can only surmise that the combination of the 1GB test data size and the 128K block size used for exFAT conspired to keep the test data largely in the drives cache during the actual benchmark run and allowed the write cycle to complete while the drive had moved onto the read portion of the benchmark. It is very rare that I see a product that actually delivers more than they advertise, and these do. In conclusion, these drives are priced very well and the performance is actually quite a bit better than what they advertise, so I have absolutely no problem recommending them!

This is your basic, unbranded USB 3.0 flash drive. It came with a little lanyard, and already formatted in exFAT, though I tested it with FakeFlashTest and reformatted back to exFAT. It tested at an actual capacity of 117.1GB, which is definitely in the right ballpark for a 128GB drive. However, even just testing the capacity seemed to be going a bit slowly, so I also checked the speed. Using CrystalDiskMark, I measured sequential read and write speeds of 120MB/s and 70 MB/s, respectively. That’s generally ok, and speedy enough for transferring very large files to/from this drive. However, if you have lots of small files to move, it’s not so good. The Random read and write were only around 5 MB/s and 0.8 MB/s, respectively. This is actually a pretty slow random write speed and reveals that this is a fairly low-quality flash memory chip, and the flash controller needs to write at a very slow rate to avoid errors while writing multiple small files or multiple random write locations. So, this is a fairly low-quality drive, and will frustrate you if you are transferring thousands of pictures or other large sets of small files (that would take hours). However, if you just plan to sneakernet a large ISO file around once in a while, this drive should be just fine. Just to verify this, I transferred a real, single 7.67GB ISO file to the drive. It took exactly 2 minutes, and wrote at an average speed of 64MB/s (always between about 62 and 65, so fairly constant speed). For the file size, this was fast enough not to cause frustration, so the drive is certainly usable for these situations. I certainly wouldn’t rely on it for long term archival storage of important files, but it should be fine to shuttle large stuff back and forth. Personally, I wouldn’t mind buying this drive, even with these limitations, if it were much cheaper than some of the name brand alternatives. Although it is somewhat less expensive, it’s not enough less expensive to justify the performance, so I’m not sure I’d call this a great “value” unless you really need to save the few extra bucks. Final Rating: 3 stars. I’m knocking off two stars for the extremely slow random write speed. But it does at least work, and sequential read/write is in the ballpark of USB 3.0 speeds (lower end, though), and the 128GB size was legitimate (117GB actual).

Nice usb flash drive, I can transfer my files to the flash drive and easy to use it. Everything works great and nice price.